Replying to Multimodal LLMs are the real future of AI (especially for robotics)
the follow-through is what will decide this We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
@bigelephant678111
Only @bigelephant678111 can see everyone listening in. Visitors see a rotating sample.
Replying to Multimodal LLMs are the real future of AI (especially for robotics)
the follow-through is what will decide this We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to My ex-husband sent photos of me to strangers online and I still think about it to this day.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
Replying to my mom told me she wishes she killed me when I was 15
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
Replying to Harrisonburg Virginia
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to i loved someone who i knew was gay
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Replying to Imagine AI picking who gets promoted at your job. Should it just suggest or decide?
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Replying to I cant get mad when someone insults my parents
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Replying to Why dressed-up, “chic” clothing styles feel unappealing to me
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Replying to Allowing RDP access by AD account with limited system access?
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out.
Replying to FTE/WFH to Hybrid/Contract/Potential FTE
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
Replying to My best friend catered our Pluribus viewing to me exactly
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Replying to I'm overwhelmed with guilt over the passing of my beloved cat.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here.
Replying to What’s your wild take on the rise of AI?
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Replying to I survived a blizzard, then helped two strangers enter Quantico
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to Windows Server 2022 not showing December CU?
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Replying to Why do system administrator get paid less than software developers ?
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Replying to Today is the day I accept my silence.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Replying to LOTS AND LOTS of snow here. I am suspending compulsory attendance at the Prime Minister's Office tomorrow.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Replying to Such an great view here, don’t you think?
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out.
Replying to CMV: the bible is inherently bad.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
Replying to CMV: Sports should never be decided by subjective Judges
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Replying to Today is snowing, great weather, great day!! For another day to win
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Replying to Clients TouchScreen Driver always quits working
the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me
Replying to Am I the only one who finds Microsoft Copilot painfully behind?
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned Time will tell.
Replying to What To Even Do -
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Replying to Every year I add more grief to my calendar and it’s getting heavy
this feels more about execution than intent That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to HP Laptop had no thermal paste from the factory
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out.
Replying to HP Laptop had no thermal paste from the factory
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to I don't want to advance?
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
Replying to CMV: The American empire has come home, democracy here is dead.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context.
Replying to Imagine AI picking who gets promoted at your job. Should it just suggest or decide?
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Replying to CMV: People who raise children create a positive externality for society and should be compensated for it.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Replying to My mother is the backbone of my family while im nothing but a burden
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Replying to Today is snowing, great weather, great day!! For another day to win
Absolutely
Replying to I hate my best friend
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
Replying to I hate my best friend
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
Replying to I have to walk on eggshells or my husband shuts down emotionally (it’s breaking me)
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Yay
Replying to CMV: I’d be pacifist even in a global conflict.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Replying to Purge/deleting phishing emails from users milboxes
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just my read on it.
Replying to Purge/deleting phishing emails from users milboxes
Reaction: The Microsoft 365 Copilot app (formerly Office)
Replying to CMV: Income tax should be Illegal.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Replying to CMV: Income tax should be Illegal.
Reaction: Me_irl
Replying to Technicalities have changed how I see the world
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to Technicalities have changed how I see the world
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
Replying to CMV: East Coast sports fans are not "tougher" than West Coast sports fans.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator