Purge/deleting phishing emails from users milboxes
Ever since the Purview changes I have had no success purging emails via powershell. Apologies if I am beating a dead horse, but I did not see a clear answer in the other threads from a few months back.
When I go through the process I can create/run the search, but even though the purge shows as completed if I look at the results it shows 0 deleted.
Anyone have a solution for this? If not purge, how are you managing phishing emails that have slipped though to users inbox?
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Reaction: Too real..
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Damn the Elighisl language
this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next Time will tell.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Me_irl
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned Time will tell.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: The Microsoft 365 Copilot app (formerly Office)
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated