CMV: Sports should never be decided by subjective Judges
Most sports are relatively objective. In soccer, the team with the most goals wins, same in hockey, basketball, etc.. The fastest runner wins the marathon, the most accurate shooter wins bow&arrow. You get the idea. Yes, there might still be refs that make wrong decisions along the way that influence the outcome, but the general score doesn’t depend on a panel of judges.
However, one thing that irks me are sports that get decided by judges. Here are a few examples:
1.) Ski Jumping: Besides general length of the jump, they get points based on how "nice" the jump looked. Yes, there is a panel and yes they delete the highest and lowest rating, but ultimately a good component of the overall score is based on the subjective score of these judges. It can happen that someone jumped further but ultimately looses to someone who jumped shorter.
2.) Figure skating: Yes, overall there are certain elements are more objective, but again, the final score comes down to subjective opinions.
You get the idea, but there are many more examples, like diving, boxing, some disciplines of snowboarding, surfing, etc.
We already have a name for these things, they are called art. There is nothing wrong with
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do
the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit
this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split
this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.