I hate my best friend
Over time, I’ve grown to dislike her more and more. I thought it’d go away, since for a while, these waves of distaste would come in waves for an hour or two and then if I saw her, they’d go away. Now, my hatred of her remains when I am near her, being texted by her, or even just thinking of or being reminded of her. It isn’t just annoyance, but full on anger and sometimes disgust over every little thing.
I‘m not entirely sure why it started happening except for the fact that we had started getting closer and she was more attached than I was and I lost the desire for connection. I wasn’t in the place to invest in any type of relationship or friendship, especially one where I can’t return anything. But instead of falling back into being acquainted, I have just started to despise her. Part of it might be that she has a few mental health issues, and I have bad correlations with those because of difficult times with family members growing up, but my other friends and I myself have my own problems. When she was most comfortable with me, she had started to give me details about her deeper psychosis and I was not the right person to hear that. Moreover, she is actively getting help, but i
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Interested to see the follow-up.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
this solves one problem while creating another Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: Me_irl
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through This could age very differently in a week.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Hate when it happens
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts
the way this is presented changes how it lands
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this Hard to say where this lands long term.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.