Allowing RDP access by AD account with limited system access?
We have a policy against "shared" Active Directory accounts to maintain the ability to audit access to individuals. However there are situations that require exceptions, mainly for Labs with instrumentation that is managed by multiple people over longer periods.
In these cases, we create AD "shared" accounts and "lock" them to particular computers by specifying those computers in the "log into" list. This works great for the most part.
However, the lab managers would like to be able to remotely monitor these systems during extended sampling analyses. We can grant the "shared" account RDP rights BUT NLA (Network Level Authentication) won't allow the account to remote login unless it has login rights to \*both\* the remote system \*and\* the local system the user is trying to remote \*from\*. I'd rather not allow the "shared" account rights to login to any system except the instrumentation computers. But NLA is forcing me to allow login to the remote computer as well, apparently.
Has anyone else run across this issue? How did you resolve it?
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another We’ll see how people react over time.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this Hard to say where this lands long term.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Not convinced this is settled yet.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Interested to see the follow-up.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split
this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
the timing matters more than people admit Hard to say where this lands long term.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Not convinced this is settled yet.
Not gonna lie, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.