Today is the day I accept my silence.
I used to think that if I worked hard enough and shared my story honestly, the world would listen. I am a software dev who was born with a hardware error. After 19 surgeries, I thought my 20th would be my upgrade to stereo sound.
After seeing 800,000 people pass by my project like I’m a ghost, I finally understand. I am meant to be incomplete. I’m giving up on the Angel of Sound project. I’m giving up on the surgery. I will just be the guy with the asymmetric face and the mono hearing. To those who actually tried to help, you made me feel human for a second. Thank you. Goodbye.
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time.
this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Time will tell.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through This could age very differently in a week.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately This could age very differently in a week.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another Feels like there’s more coming here.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this We’ll see how people react over time.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate
this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Time will tell.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts Not convinced this is settled yet.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.