CMV: the bible is inherently bad.
Before I start this i just want to say, not all Christians are sexist, misogynistic or bad just that the bible and Christianity is.
Straight away in Genesis God said “I will greatly increase your sorrow and your conception—in sorrow shall you bring forth children. Your desire shall be toward your husband, and he shall rule over you.” which the last part is definitely patriarchal and sexist.Adam also betrayed God, but he had less of a punishment than eve.
The bible also claims menstruation is dirty and unclean, its completely normal for all women to do this, a completely normal thing to go through, and yet in the bible its stated it's unclean in leviticus, its also said anything she touches is impure, now that is completely misogynistic, aswell that anyone who touches her is impure.
The bible also is wishy-washy on slavery, it states that a slave shall obey their master but also some believe that its calling for abolition.
Now I believe some teachings in the bible sre good such as the ten commandments but its hidden beneath these statements, I also don't hate Christianity.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s just how it reads to me.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels more about execution than intent Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on
this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on