Imagine AI picking who gets promoted at your job. Should it just suggest or decide?
Hey everyone, imagine logging into work and finding out an AI system just picked who gets promoted, based on your emails, typing speed, or based on performance or even how often you check news sites.
Sounds wild, right? But a recent survey shows 60% of managers already use AI for stuff like raises and promotions. It could cut out human bias, but what if it misses the real story behind your hard work?
Should AI just suggest options, or actually decide? Like, assist with data but let humans call the shots? Or go full auto?
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Reaction: Me_irl
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Title*
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
Reaction: lock in chat
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: When the villian catches the hero:
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This could age very differently in a week.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Weird question, but was the person who come up with the term, "love handles" a chubby chaser?
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.