CMV: The American empire has come home, democracy here is dead.
It’s impossible to sustain democracy at home and empire abroad. Recent events show that the American empire has come home, with the bloated military budget now being used to arrest and murder citizens. There is no real political representation for most people, just two parties with overlapping donors as their constituents. The press is entirely captured by powerful corporations and the rich. Corporate rule has been in place since at least the Citizens United ruling, and our democracy, which barely existed during this time, has finally died. It’s one-man government, congress doesn’t exist. It’s the emperor Trump show now, with American citizens facing the same military terrorism as we are used to seeing abroad. You can’t allow CIA black sites, torture and suspension of human rights abroad and not expect it to eventually come home to roost.
Edit: I'm going to stop checking responses to this thread because I have to go to work. Thank you to all who responded, and no hard feelings. I awarded one delta for forcibly demonstrating substantive outcomes between the two major parties based on policy differences. However, my mind has not been changed from my original viewpoint. I am tempted t
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Time will tell.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Reaction: me_irl
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: W MOM
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: I cannot elaborate on this meme
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable
this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Im not a cheater just an embarrassed idiot. Also Im scared a friend will send something stupid or if someone hacks my phone to put something bad without me knowing.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: Me_irl
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Interested to see the follow-up.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned Curious how this plays out.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: When the villian catches the hero:
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up.
this depends heavily on what happens next Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: me_irl
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: When the villian catches the hero:
this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
Reaction: The logic is infallible
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: Me_irl
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: me_irl
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
the timing matters more than people admit
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Reaction: Ujumf*
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Something I've observed
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: French is so hard
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: me_irl
the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
Reaction: Something I've observed
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out.
Reaction: lock in chat
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: problem solved
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately Time will tell.
Reaction: Something I've observed
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately
Reaction: me_irl
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: literally 1984
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: me_irl
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Too real..
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: Reddits privacy feature is so useless
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet.
this comes across more reactive than planned We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: fnaf movey
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Curious how this plays out.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled At least from my perspective.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: Title*
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Title*
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on
Reaction: me_irl
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Just always
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Its been 3 years since I last saw morning
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: I cannot elaborate on this meme
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Downvote away
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Curious how this plays out.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Me_irl
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Too real..
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: They both have a serious jaw condition so it should be a fair fight
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: lock in chat
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: me_irl
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Time will tell.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Just always
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: They must be illiterate or something...
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: Damn the Elighisl language
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: very shocking
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Me irl
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: Me_irl
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated
this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Me irl
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: literally 1984
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me