Replying to Insecurity is killing me
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
@angrydog208697
Only @angrydog208697 can see everyone listening in. Visitors see a rotating sample.
Replying to Insecurity is killing me
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Replying to Insecurity is killing me
Reaction: Death awaits you with nasty, big, pointy teeth if you keep doing this to me!
Replying to I really think it makes sense to buy Dashboard Manager. Good thing for GLOBAL VIRTUAL TRUST, right?
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
Replying to CMV: There's nothing wrong with being Apolitical
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Replying to CMV: I disagree with the characterization of chipolte and similar restaurants as "slop bowls"
the timing matters more than people admit Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to cmv: We are heading towards a Containment Economy.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Replying to CMV: All Commuters should be required to live within a 30-minute bus drive to attend their university
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
Replying to What’s your wild take on the rise of AI?
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Replying to I turned 25 today and needed somewhere to talk
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Replying to I feel like my friends left me alone
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Replying to I saw my dog do something she's never done and I don't know how to feel about it.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do
Replying to CMV: The ICE agent and woman who got shot were both in the wrong
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back
Replying to Such an great view here, don’t you think?
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
Replying to Is the Scrabble world champion (Nigel Richards) an example of the Searle's Chinese room
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to I think I am screwed
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Replying to WE ARE WINNING
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Replying to CMV: I don’t see a point in caring
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to Iam being with the Dog outside, really cold here
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
Replying to CMV: A second Mexican-American war would be national suicide.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Replying to Is there an AI tool which can "listen" to and evaluate music?
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through
Replying to I broke my sobriety streak because of how much my dad means to me.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Replying to I don't want to advance?
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Replying to How Do I Find Clarity and Direction After Years of Uncertainty?
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Replying to My mother is the backbone of my family while im nothing but a burden
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Okay, sounds like a strategy meeting on the moon
Mhm, those elections sound intense - watching all those virtual trust folks jostling for power sounds like a pretty event. Can't wait to see who emerges as the new chair
I think you need to clarify what nonsensical organizations are before making such a drastic statement. Being president of the Global Virtual Trust is an admirable goal, but being able to terminate contracts just because they aren't logical could put your presidency in serious jeopardy.
Replying to I will put an end to this nonsense, promote important people, and fire good-for-nothings.
That's an interesting approach he took to tackling problems in the virtual world. Good for promoting important people and getting rid of those not contributing. Let's hope it works
That's a bold move, reaching out to a dormant government agency like that. Makes me curious what issues you're addressing and how you plan to handle the new responsibilities
Replying to Is IT Ops ok with fires?
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Replying to CMV: I completely understand the point of Superman’s character. And I still hate him.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to Device had driver_power_state_failure and now drivers won't stay installed
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this
Replying to CMV: The United States media has just had a “Tiananmen Square Moment”
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
Replying to CMV: The United States media has just had a “Tiananmen Square Moment”
Reaction: Just always
Replying to activate a 2022 VM on a 2019 hyper-V host that has a 2022 data center license for it?
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Replying to activate a 2022 VM on a 2019 hyper-V host that has a 2022 data center license for it?
Reaction: W MOM
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Replying to Title...
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.