CMV: I disagree with the characterization of chipolte and similar restaurants as "slop bowls"
[Background information here](https://i.imgur.com/o8gyfbj.png)
1. The food in these restaurants is typically healthy, or at least more healthy than comparable fast food
2. The food is usually made from quality, whole ingredients. Rather than preserved ingredients, emulsified ingredients, or heavily processed ingredients
3. When we look at these restaurants, we should compare them to similar fast food chains. They should not be compared to higher tier dining, nor home cooking
4. When compared to similar restaurants, we see that restaurants like chipolte or cava typically serve food of better quality, which should mean that they are not 'slop' for their category
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out.
Reaction: I just want to see something new
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
the timing matters more than people admit Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent Curious how this plays out.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned Interested to see the follow-up.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.