Device had driver_power_state_failure and now drivers won't stay installed
Hello, I have a computer that had DRIVER\_POWER\_STATE\_FAILURE (0x9F) BSOD. I did sfc /scannow and DISM, neither helped. It continues to try install updates in Windows Updates and drivers (Bluetooth, net) which are not sticking. Once I restart and check windows updates they're there to be downloaded and installed again.
I did reset the windows update service, restart the computer, checked event viewer for anything awkward.
Where to start?
this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: When the villian catches the hero:
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: lock in chat
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: me_irl
the follow-through is what will decide this Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so At least from my perspective.
Reaction: The Microsoft 365 Copilot app (formerly Office)
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Just always
Reaction: me_irl
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That part stands out.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Reaction: me_irl
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart