Is there an AI tool which can "listen" to and evaluate music?
The title of the thread kind of says it all. I'm trying to generate music tracks on the AI platform Suno. But I want to get some feedback on the tracks I'm creating. Obviously AI can't "listen" to it in the traditional, human sense, but it can't really "think" about the quality of an e-mail you're working on, either, yet it is able to analyze anyway. I asked the usual suspect, ChatGPT, but it keeps fighting me on it. At first it DID provide evaluation, but now it's saying that it can only listen to audio files SOMETIMES, and that there is no rhyme or reason to when it can (even for paid members). I am hoping for an AI tool which I can rely on for this purpose! That does so consistently and not arbitrarily like this. Thank you!
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Not convinced this is settled yet.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate
the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like there’s more coming here.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell.
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.