CMV: All Commuters should be required to live within a 30-minute bus drive to attend their university
# Definitions
* **Commuter school:** A college/university where most students travel to college/university for classes and then go home afterwards because of other responsibilities (e.g. job, family, etc).
* **Social life:** An aspect the college offers to student/faculty/staff members to engage with the university outside of academics (e.g. Student organizations (aka clubs), university-sanctioned events (e.g. college sports, music concerts, etc.), parties, traditions (new or existing).
# My Thoughts
It's not uncommon for my university to have students commuting at least 30 minutes to 2 hours to arrive to the university or depart back to their homes. Forcing all of those students to live within a 30-minute bus drive from campus is ultimately necessary because there are academics studies that found that driving affect one's physical and mental health, so not only would this solution cut down the need for them to commute but also reduce the overall traffic of the city. Why travel that long when one can go to another university that will offer the equivalent program?
Doing so would, as a result, improve the overall social life of the university because these students would then have t
the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.