CMV: Purpose and Meaning are not important at all, and a desperate need to find either is generally a sign of low self w
I think human life is inherently "worth it", it needs no greater explanation. Your particular life doesn't need purpose or meaning, neither does humanity as a whole. Some people just need it to feel better about themselves because they don't value themselves just for existing.
My reason for this is mainly anecdotal. The only people I've ever seen who work to find purpose and meaning don't think life is enough as it is and are unhappy about it. There is also a lot of virtue signaling when people say something gives them purpose.
Lastly, I think life is beautiful as it is. It can be hard and crazy and exhilarating and mind numbing dull and horrible. And every single person is living a completely unique experience and story that never existed and never will exist again. I just think life IS the whole point. Everything else feels like a bit of a circle jerk.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so We’ll see how people react over time.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned
the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through Let’s see what happens next.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to
this solves one problem while creating another Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like there’s more coming here.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit Not convinced this is settled yet.
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent Interested to see the follow-up.
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That part stands out.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to