I saw my dog do something she's never done and I don't know how to feel about it.
I live alone upstairs in an upstairs apartment building, and since I got my Eski, Lucy (2 yearsf), I taught her to only go up the stairs, and not down (She's carried downstairs to pee and play etc). I did this because I was worried that she could go downstairs without my notice, and terrorize some kids/people (she's a darling and can't hurt a fly, but she can be a bully if she knows you're scared of her). So right from when she was a pup, it'd always been that way. Everytime I come back from an outing (I hardly even lock my doors), she'd be at the patio/verandah of my apartment, at the edge of the stairs, going crazy. Feverish, shaking (she has a bit of separation anxiety), waiting for me to get to her. It's cute.
Now being the darling she is, she usually gets a lotta guests, and recently it's been a couple of kids in the neighborhood. Sometimes they come on Saturdays when I'm outside working out or watching my friends play soccer. Or on evenings when I take a walk or a go for a quick bite (The last time they came was yesterday).
Now here's what's crazy. Today I was downstairs and coming up the stairs, when I saw Lucy trottling down the stairs, with a big grin on her face. I froze
the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately
the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.