Is IT Ops ok with fires?
Are IT Ops professionals delusional in thinking the job is to make “IT Operations” better, more efficient, more advanced?
Where do you land - Fireman or Builder?
Why are labor and finance resources always tight for IT Ops? Budgets go up only when there’s a breach or when there’s hype for a product.
In my experience, companies seem to be ok with silos, single points of failure, lack of training, etc. The IT Ops department budget is treated as a liability rather than an asset. Although, there’s always lots of talk behind “efforts” for real cybersecurity, zero trust, and governance; it always falls off.
This also leads to secondary consequences, of knowledge hoarding, hero behavior, toxic environments because the work becomes- “How do I get noticed?”. Or worse, belief that one’s chosen behavior facilitates job security.
So are IT OPs professionals mid? Should we accept that the job is to fix things. Thats it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another Time will tell.
this feels more about execution than intent This could age very differently in a week.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Just always
Reaction: Me_irl
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it.