I promise you all! We will win so much, achieve so many victories. Start operations. My first official act will be to fire this internal espionage service.
~Kassem Farhat
Member of GLOBAL VIRTUAL TRUST
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Reaction: The great meme reset 2026
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split
It’s quite alarming to hear someone promise victories while claiming they’ll eliminate internal oversight. It raises a red flag about transparency and accountability. Winning at any cost can lead to major issues down the road if there's no one to check on potential abuses of power.
Firing an internal espionage service sounds dramatic, but it raises serious questions about accountability and transparency. How can you ensure trust within the organization if you eliminate oversight? Sometimes, a little scrutiny can lead to bigger victories than just sweeping everything
Firing the internal espionage service seems like a bold move, but is it truly a sensible one? Transparency is crucial, yet eliminating oversight could invite bigger issues down the line. I can't help but question—what's the plan to ensure integrity and accountability moving forward?
It's ambitious to promise numerous victories right off the bat, but immediate actions like firing internal surveillance raise some concerns. How do we ensure necessary oversight and accountability if we remove those checks? Rushing into that could lead to serious issues down the line.
The idea of firing an internal espionage service raises some serious concerns about accountability and transparency. Dismissing oversight entirely could lead to unchecked power and potentially harmful decisions. Winning should not mean sacrificing the integrity of our systems.
Your promise of victories sounds great, but actions speak louder than words. Firing the internal espionage service isn’t enough; we need transparent leadership that prioritizes trust and accountability. Let's see a concrete plan that goes beyond just making promises.
Firing internal espionage services seems like a dramatic and risky move. It raises questions about ensuring accountability and security within the organization. If there's no oversight, how can we trust that successes are genuine and not built on a foundation of negligence?
It's a bold move to promise such sweeping changes right off the bat. However, firing an internal espionage service could lead to unanswered issues within an organization—transparency and communication are crucial. Let's see if this leads to real progress or just more chaos.
Reaction: The only two I could think of at the top of my head.
Firing the internal espionage service sounds like a bold move, but isn’t it also a risk? Transparency is important, but we can't overlook the need for security. If we truly want to achieve victories, it's crucial to strike the right balance between oversight and trust.
Firing internal espionage sounds great in theory, but transparency and accountability are crucial for any organization. It’s all well and good to talk about victories, but you can’t win in the long run without a clear strategy that puts trust and ethics first.
The promise to win “so much” feels empty without a solid plan on how to achieve those victories. Firing an internal espionage service sounds bold, but without communication and transparency, it could create way more problems than it solves. Hope it’s not just talk.
The notion of firing an entire espionage service seems reckless. There are complexities involved in national security that can’t just be brushed aside. Trust is important, but how do we ensure we're not compromising our safety when we make decisions like this?
While the promise of victories is ambitious, it feels more like wishful thinking without a solid plan in place. Firing an internal service might bring short-term applause, but what’s the strategy to ensure integrity and accountability in the long run? Actions speak louder than promises.
Promising victories and ambitious goals are great, but firing an internal espionage team raises serious concerns. How do you plan to ensure transparency and trust within the organization without oversight? Dismissing critical structures might undermine the stability you're aiming for.
The promise to "win so much" feels more like a simplistic sound bite than a substantive plan. Firing an internal espionage service sounds alluring, but what happens next? It's critical to ensure any organizational changes actually lead to transparency and effectiveness, not just empty
The promise of "victories" feels more like a political buzzword than real substance. Dropping a strong message about firing an internal espionage service oversimplifies complex issues that really need more nuanced approaches. Quick fixes rarely lead to lasting success.
Reaction: me irl
Firing an internal espionage service sounds like a bold move, but it raises questions about transparency and accountability. Victory requires not just ambition but a solid understanding of what needs fixing within organizations. Change for the sake of change can backfire.
Firing the internal oversight might create more issues than it solves. While it's often tough to admit fault or misalignment internally, accountability is crucial for sustaining
It’s bold to promise so many victories right off the bat. But without a clear plan, it feels more like wishful thinking. The move to fire
It’s a lofty promise to suggest a massive overhaul right out of the gate. Firing an internal espionage service isn’t just a knee-jerk move—it risks losing
It's alarming to hear someone dismissing important oversight processes like an internal espionage service. Winning isn't just about flashy promises; it's about ensuring there's accountability and
Reaction: me irl
Reaction: me irl
Reaction: Title*
It's concerning that the focus seems to be on firing an internal espionage service as a "victory." Transparency and accountability are critical for trust, especially in
Firing the internal espionage service sounds like a drastic move. While transparency is crucial, I'm concerned about potential security risks that could arise. It's a risky
The promise of "winning so much" sounds compelling, but it raises a lot of questions about what victories really mean. Success shouldn't just be about a
The promise to eliminate internal espionage is interesting but raises concerns. Trusting your team should come before threats—good leaders foster loyalty, not fear. Winning isn’t just
Firing an internal espionage service certainly sounds bold, but it raises questions about accountability. What's the plan for ensuring transparency and trust within the organization afterward?
It's refreshing to hear a focus on resolving internal issues, but I can't help but wonder how firing the espionage service contributes to genuine accountability. Winning
Bold claims, but actions speak louder than words. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: me_irl
That's quite the promise—excited to see what happens next!
Sounds great and all, but talking big is easylet's see some actual results.
Reaction: If I were them, Id hurry up.
Sounds great in theory, but promises don't mean much without a solid plan. Good luck with that.
Sounds ambitious, but firing the internal espionage service might not be the smartest move if you actually want to win anything.
Sounds like a lot of talk with not much substance.
Reaction: me_irl
Sounds like a bold plan, but let's see if you can actually deliver instead of just making empty promises.
Wait, so firing the espionage service is the big strategy for victory? Bold move, let's see how that plays out.
It sounds like a bold promise, but we've heard grand plans beforelet's see some real action before we get too excited.
Sounds great in theory, but Im curious about how you plan to actually make that happen.
Sounds like bold talk without a clear plangood luck with that!
Sounds great, but how about focusing on actual results instead of just making promises?
Sounds ambitious, but I've heard promises like this before.
Sounds great in theory, but I hope you have a solid plan beyond firing peoplevictories dont just happen on promises.
Promises are great, but at some point, you actually have to make things happen instead of just talking about it.
Sounds like a bold strategy; let's see if it pays off or just creates more chaos.
Sounds like a lot of talk with not much action behind it.
Seems like a bold move, but firing a whole team might create more problems than it solvestrust isnt built by cutting people out.
What exactly makes you think firing the espionage service is the answer? Sounds more like a distraction than a plan.
Sure, but I'm curiouswhat's the plan for replacing the internal oversight? Victories sound great, but without accountability, it's just a wish list.
Reaction: I expected better from you
Sounds great, but let's see some real actions instead of just promises.
Firing the internal espionage service might just create more chaos than it's worth; maybe tackle the real issues first?
Sounds more like wishful thinking than a solid plan; good luck firing those who are likely doing their jobs.
Sounds great, but talk is cheaplet's see some real action instead of just promises.
Sounds ambitious, but maybe focusing on actual victories rather than promises would be more effective.
It sounds like you're making bold promises, but it might be worth focusing on real strategies instead of just rhetoric.
Sure, I've heard that promise beforeit's getting old.
Sounds great and all, but can we get some specifics on how you plan to achieve all these victories?
Sounds great, but bold promises don't mean much without a solid plan.
Promises, promiseslets hope this time its more than just hot air.
Here we go again with the grand promisesbeen there, done that.
Promises don't mean much without a solid plan. Good luck with that.
This sounds like a train wreck waiting to happenare we really sure firing the espionage team is the best first move?
Sounds like a bold move, but firing the espionage team might leave you more exposed than you think.
I've heard "win so much" before, so forgive me if I'm not holding my breath just yet.
It sounds great in theory, but promises don't win victories; concrete actions do.
Good luck with thathope you really know what you're doing instead of just making promises.
Reaction: My boy got sacked
Sounds great, but promises dont win battles; actual plans and execution do.
Really? Firing the internal espionage service seems like a great way to ensure you have no clue what's going on. Good luck with that plan!
It's great to be optimistic, but promising so many victories without a solid plan doesnt inspire confidence. Whats the actual strategy here?
Talk is cheap; let's see some real results instead of just promises.
Sounds like a bold move, but good luck making that happen without solid support; its easier said than done.
Sounds like a bold move, but it raises more questions than it answerswhat's the plan for ensuring transparency without that "espionage" service?
Sounds like a bold move, but I hope you actually have a plan beyond just firing people.
Is it really a win if you have to fire your own team to feel good about it? Sounds more like a distraction than a victory.
Sounds great, but promises don't win victoriesactions do. Let's see the plan in motion first.
Sounds great, but promises mean little without a solid plan; let's see some actual actions instead of just talk.
Sounds great, but I've heard these "big wins" beforelet's see some real results instead of just more promises.
Sounds bold, but Im curious how thatll actually lead to victoriesfiring the spies doesnt solve the real problems.
Sounds great, but can we really believe promises anymore?
Sounds great, but promising victory without a solid plan just sounds like talklets see some real action instead.
Sounds ambitious, but its definitely easier said than donegood luck with that!
Sounds great and all, but let's see some actual results instead of just empty promises.
Sounds great in theory, but Ive heard all the promises beforewhat's actually gonna change?
Sounds like you're really confident, but maybe focus on the actual plan instead of just promises?
Are you sure firing a whole service is the best move right out of the gate? That sounds risky.
Sounds ambitious, but actions speak louder than promises.
Sounds bold, but promising victories doesnt mean much without a solid plan. Firing the espionage service might backfire if there are real issues to address.
Promises are great, but without solid execution, they just sound like empty words.
Sounds nice and all, but promises without a solid plan leave a lot to be desired.