What To Even Do -
The main thrust of this post is mainly just to seek others who may have been in similar ways.
After a marriage breakdown, we have a child together, I moved out. But. But I don't have anywhere to go.
The marriage broke down because - because - it just did. No drink. Violence. Affairs. Nothing like that.
I think we just forgot we were married. I moved out because small matters would become big arguments and it was becoming a hostile place.
We needed space.
So I left.
I sofa surfed. I came back 'home' every few days to see daughter. She - she's fabulous. Just all types of fab. But I've been living rough. Freezing at night. Using swimming pool changing rooms to shower. Not eating. Just sleeping or walking outside - go to work in day - pretending all is okay.
I lost my job back in November. Redundancies. And just got myself a new job and maybe - maybe - once my income is back in positive I can hurl myself out of this pit.
I dunno.
I'm not gonna break the subs rules to talk about how im feeling and how I wish I wasn't here.
But. I dunno.
Anyone with half a less stressed and anxiety filled brain know what to do.i just feel useless and pathetic and im just so done.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately This could age very differently in a week.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
the way this is presented changes how it lands
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Hard to say where this lands long term.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent Hard to say where this lands long term.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to
the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just how it reads to me.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
the follow-through is what will decide this Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like an opening move, not an ending.