Tragedy
It breaks my heart to see the wife of Mrs. Good crying on the ground because she "made her" come there.
... Honey, this isnt your fault. You were simply speaking out against the injustice you were seeing, and violations of the rights of your neighbors. Now its our turn to speak for you.They violated your right to oppose the actions of this out of control administration and its immigration machine. You were doing it peacefully and safely. Its our duty as Americans to protest these illegal and immoral actions, and hold to account those responsible for this shit show. We cannot allow this to continue to happen. Peoples lives have value. Your wifes life had value. She deserved to live, and she had the absolute right to speak up for those whose rights are being violated. Members of our communities are being unconstitutionally harrassed and traumatized by this administration and its charade of racism and hate. She lost her life defending the rights of others by exercising her own, and we would be remiss if we didnt do the same, and speak out against this.
A wise woman once said "Speak the truth, even if your voice shakes."
... You have my voice.
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Me_irl
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Downvote away
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
the timing matters more than people admit Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Let’s see what happens next.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Curious how this plays out.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.