Should i force myself to leave?
My girl and i have always had on and off communication skills but recently i feel as if shes ruining my mental health more... She has made me really dependent on her and need her-backstory whenever i didnt listen or wanted to do my own things she would make me feel bad and guilty about it and use it against me so i started to i guess depend on her now its every time she leaves i feel depressed and upset.
When we get into arguments she will use it against me and not talk to me or use dry responses to throw me off and like "crawl back to her" i feel as this is really ruining me mentally and physically because i've always been a anxious person- pzhysopfrenia, anxiety, depression, bpd. and she knows that that stuff really makes me feel unwanted and i feel as if im being manipulated into needing her. Or am i just crazy and im over thinking this drastically...
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like there’s more coming here.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent Hard to say where this lands long term.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That part stands out.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Time will tell.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Time will tell.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Not convinced this is settled yet.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned Time will tell.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.