Sentinel Alert: C2 like activity from Bluesky???
Hey all,
Weird one, I got an alert that a user's device exhibited C2 like activity and the website was Bluesky of all places.
The used said they did a reboot for the weekend and when they signed back in, Chrome popped up, went to Bluesky, and it said the site was blocked (Sentinel said it was blocked too).
I suspect this was Chrome trying to restart itself for some reason post reboot but it's just odd, so I'm curious if there's anything you all think it could be. Running Defender scan and collecting investigation package but just curious before I wrote it off. Thanks!
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Me_irl
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this
Reaction: Something I've observed
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
the direction makes sense but the details are messy
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split
Reaction: problem solved
this comes across more reactive than planned Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: The adjective for metal is metallic, but not so for iron
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: I cannot elaborate on this meme
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Me_irl
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Reaction: POV: You Are Brooklyn Jail Warden, What Will You Do?
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Too real..
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place Not convinced this is settled yet.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.