my mom told me she wishes she killed me when I was 15
my mom has been always toxic growing up, when I was 15, she asked me to do a task (I told her I couldn’t do it and didn’t do it for once). she started yelling at me and said some hurtful things I don’t even remember while also hitting me, I remember exactly how she said, in those exact words “I wish I sat on you and killed you the day I gave birth to you”. those words literally still haunt me to this day. I’m 26, it happened 11 years ago, and I still hear them in my head from time to time. i’ve heard “I wish I never had you” or “I wish I aborted you” many times before from her and they don’t affect me as much but this one hit really different for some reason. every time I remember it I just start crying.
she has changed a lot when I grew up, she became a better person for my younger sisters, but I can’t forgive or forget everything she’s done to me. it makes me feel like an awful person, my relationship with her is as formal as it gets, and I sometimes react angry to anything she says even if it’s normal without even realizing it. I wanna try to forget it but I genuinely can’t. there haven’t been any words that affected my life as much as these and I don’t think there’ll ever be.
[
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned Hard to say where this lands long term.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Curious how this plays out.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do
the follow-through is what will decide this Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Interested to see the follow-up.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Let’s see what happens next.