Microsoft Cert Expired
Anyone else getting Outlook cert expiration notices for ajax.microsoft.com thru Outlook Classic, Win 11 24h2 machine.
We have gotten only this one report now. I assume the cert on one of their nodes just hasnt been rotated yet? Any ideas? Thanks.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
This certificate is intended for the following purposes):
• Ensures the identity of a remote computer
* Refer to the certification authority's statement for details.
Issued to: ajax.microsoft.com
Issued by: Microsoft Azure ECC TLS Issuing CA 04
Valid from 1/15/2025 to 1/10/2026
ASP.NET Core, an open-source web development framework | .NET
Build web apps and services that run on Windows, Linux, and macOS using C#, HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Get started for free on Windows, Lin…
ajax.microsoft.com
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: lock in chat
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Reddits privacy feature is so useless
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: lock in chat
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Just always
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. Time will tell.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated
the way this is presented changes how it lands We’ll see how people react over time.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next This probably isn’t the last word on it.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: They both have a serious jaw condition so it should be a fair fight
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out.
Reaction: Damn the Elighisl language
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified At least from my perspective.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to
Reaction: Conformity Gate
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out.