Have you ever had a dream that affected you in real life?
I fell in love in a dream a week ago. I sobbed for a day. It was a girl. She had red hair and was absolutely amazing.
It really did fuck me up, but it helped me be more aware when I’m dreaming 😭
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out.
this feels more about execution than intent
this feels more about execution than intent
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Time will tell.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
this feels more about execution than intent
this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me_irl
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: me_irl
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: me_irl
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: me_irl
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell.
Reaction: me_irl
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on
Reaction: Me irl
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent Time will tell.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Just always
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this At least from my perspective.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: very shocking
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on
the follow-through is what will decide this
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Me_irl
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Me_irl
Reaction: me_irl
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: Me_irl
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts
Reaction: me_irl
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit This could age very differently in a week.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: very shocking
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on
Reaction: me_irl
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts Not convinced this is settled yet.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: POV: You Are Brooklyn Jail Warden, What Will You Do?
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Time will tell.
Reaction: me_irl
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do
the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Classic FNaF games be like:
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Me irl
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: Classic FNaF games be like: