CMV: Trump administration wants to tank the dollar and the US economy to profit from it before the ship sinks
Nearly 40T in debt. Trump administration keeps touting that the tariffs are paying off debts (which is not true) and even said that they plan to increase military spending from 1T to 1.5T in 2027.
Because they are insiders, they see the sinking ship and that there is no way around it. So they are profiteering from it while they still can. This aligns with what the Trump administration is doing, threatening with military actions everywhere (including Greenland) to increase weapon sales and set up opportunities for shorting the entire stock market in the US.
What other explanation can you have for Greenland? Minerals are one, but let's be fair, no administration is that forward-looking. The real reason is that by alienating the EU, they allow the process of US companies to tank faster and given all the insider information they have, make insane profit from the average joe.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: The great meme reset
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated
the timing matters more than people admit We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: Too real..
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: He belongs to her now.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands Time will tell.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like there’s more coming here.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next Hard to say where this lands long term.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting.
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: lock in chat
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Just...why??
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: I cannot elaborate on this meme
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Its been 3 years since I last saw morning
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.