CMV: The only safe chance for change in America is the upcoming midterms. Civil unrest will make the authoritarianism ir
I keep seeing posts alluding to revolution or political violence on the front page. While I do believe anger of this magnitude is warranted given recent events (ESPECIALLY with the ICE shooting and the admins handling of it), I think a campaign of civil unrest will inevitably play into the administrations hand.
The administration knows that it will be the end of them this midterm. I mean, they know they are losing popular support, just look at the gerrymandering in states like Texas. They have failed to achieve their biggest campaign promise, solving the cost of living crisis. On top of that, scandle after scandle just keep getting worse; not that previous controversy swayed voters last time around. The only hope for them to hold onto power is to suspend the election using the insurrection act or to rig the election (which is very difficult to get away with due to its decentralization).
Trump tried to send the national guard into cities in order to start a confrontation but was refused. Now, they have sent their ICE brigade (who are personally loyal to trump and are WILLING to start shit unlike the NG who are mostly just doing a job) into Minneapolis to terrorise people. It isn't a
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another Let’s see what happens next.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: Me_irl
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit
Reaction: Too real..
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Some times the dankmemes are found and not created
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
Reaction: Pepe in the cupboard
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Just...why??
the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: Just...why??
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: POV: You Are Brooklyn Jail Warden, What Will You Do?
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: Just...why??