CMV: The additional footage of the Minneapolis shooting will not change anyone’s mind.
The incentive to pick a side in this modern day idiocracy is too strong. You must use the limited information and exploit it to grandstand or justify your moral superiority and outrage. That goes for bad actors on the right and the left.
Honestly, if we cannot even come to terms that a situation can have shades of grey and seriously complexity and multiple mistakes by all involved, how can we have a discussion? I expect many of the replies here essentially grandstanding or posturing calling for the heads of ICE or the anointing of the late Ms. Good, who likely did not want to be martyred for any movement.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
Reaction: "I Can't Eat This!" ~Pig
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Reaction: me_irl
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here.
this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: Something I've observed
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: lock in chat
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: me_irl
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore
Reaction: Ujumf*
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me.