CMV: People in general need to stop forcing their moral worldview on people.
Nowadays, there is this horrible issue of people forcing their ideology on other people.
This has gotten so bad nowadays.
What do I mean? Here are some examples:
1. The collective shout nonsense
2. Trump forcing Christianity on the USA
3. The “Oh you use AI? You’re a N\*zi!!!” narrative
4. If you’re not vegan, you’re an abuser!
Everyone should be vegan.
5. We need to make being a furry illegal!
6. We should ban anime X because we are prudes!
I think we should stop doing this. This is just bad.
If you don’t like anime, don’t watch it. If you don’t like AI, don’t use it. It doesn’t mean you need to dehumanize the other side. It doesn’t mean you need to go on a “holy crusade” for your ideology. Let people live in peace. Let them do what they want, and don’t make choices for other people.
If you think eating animals is immoral, you can be vegan. But this doesn’t mean you should force the whole world should be vegan.
Here’s another mini rant: I don’t like how people use the argument “If you don’t agree with me, you’re X” replace X with any sort of bad person, like Nazi or P\*do
EDIT: this post is closed, I will not be responding to further messages
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Interested to see the follow-up.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back
Reaction: problem solved
the timing matters more than people admit Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
Reaction: Please do not the gun!
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: me_irl
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.