CMV: Overweight/Unattractive women being rejected from “Miami” style clubs aren’t the victims
https://www.reddit.com/r/CringeTikToks/s/YGgrSrW3T7
I saw this post and have seen a few comments about this over the past year, particularly when the body positivity movement was happening. In summary, it’s the complaint that stereotypically attractive women are given special privileges when going to clubs in places like Miami, while unattractive/overweight women are treated worse. It’s always presented as the club are the bad guys and the overweight women are the victims but this isn’t the case at all. If you consider the human dynamics along with the club dynamics the overweight women are actually the perpetrators of their own demise.
**CLUB DYNAMICS**
Let’s analyze the type of club these places are. They are primarily for shallow people to spend irresponsible amounts of money to flex for strangers. As with most clubs, men spend the majority of the money buying drinks and entrance fees. How do they get men there? Women, specifically attractive women. Men generally will go to the clubs which have the greatest amount of attractive women, thus there is an incentive to let attractive women in. They generate customers and by extension revenue.
On the other hand, an unattractive/overwe
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next
Reaction: Jiggle physics
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Me_irl
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just how it reads to me.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to
Reaction: Just always
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
Reaction: Classic FNaF games be like:
the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.