CMV: Jackson Hinkle would make a better US president than any other political figure today
I'm not saying I agree with him on everything. I am saying that his leadership in total, would do better on foreign and domestic policy for the both the US and the world.
First reason I think this, is foreign policy. He can be 100% trusted to not start any more foreign wars. He won't try to invade cuba, venezuela, iran or anywhere. This will mean that no US soldiers or foriegners get killed and we save alot of money too. The only potential downside I can think of, is that he will totally cut US aid to ukraine. However the current US aid to Ukraine is pretty small anyway, and this doesn't outweigh the upsides.
Second reason is domestic policy. I think after ending foreign conflicts he will reinvest in the economy, building highspeed rail and stuff and creating job. Trump said he'd do this, but obviously lied, but I think hinkle actually would. He has more of an ideological commitment to. He's also going to break up and nationalise big monopolies, like water, healthcare ect. Most of the people in his party seem to be pretty pragmatic and smart on economic issues, supporting a true mixed economy.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to
this comes across more reactive than planned This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.