CMV: I disagree with the characterization of chipolte and similar restaurants as "slop bowls"
[Background information here](https://i.imgur.com/o8gyfbj.png)
1. The food in these restaurants is typically healthy, or at least more healthy than comparable fast food
2. The food is usually made from quality, whole ingredients. Rather than preserved ingredients, emulsified ingredients, or heavily processed ingredients
3. When we look at these restaurants, we should compare them to similar fast food chains. They should not be compared to higher tier dining, nor home cooking
4. When compared to similar restaurants, we see that restaurants like chipolte or cava typically serve food of better quality, which should mean that they are not 'slop' for their category
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Not convinced this is settled yet.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: The logic is infallible
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: me_irl
this solves one problem while creating another That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: "I Can't Eat This!" ~Pig
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Some times the dankmemes are found and not created
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart