CMV: I can't see how a realistic progressive welfare state like what AOC or Bernie think of is possible anymore.
So a problem that europe is facing right now is that they pension system is way too large for they amount of workers. I heard somewhere there is gonna be 2 pensioner for 1 worker in France. I think this would depress they birth rate further as high taxes plus having to take care of grandparents will make people have to deal with have less time to have kids thus repeating they cycle, while yes ai will reduce labor requirements, A,I can't stimulate demand as a robot can't buy stuff from a market etc. I also heard that religious people and extremely religious people have more kids. They thing is leftist don't tend to be they people how are extremely religious or have kids as much as conservatives exactly plan to have a welfare state which requires a ton of young people but don't have kids , before you ask no taxing they rich would not solve this as France and every Europe country tax their people more but they also have a brain drain and it hard to generate as much wealth as america so they successful leave thus putting more strain on their system. Immigration won't fix it as they global birth rate is going down. I use ai to fix my spelling
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That part stands out.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: The Microsoft 365 Copilot app (formerly Office)
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Reddits privacy feature is so useless
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: Just always
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me_irl
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Just...why??
this depends heavily on what happens next This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: very shocking
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.