CMV: Building up legal community organization will do nothing when the goal of the government is to kill your entire com
Please be aware this is not a call for illegal action.
I have heard repeatedly that legal community organizing should be our strategy to resist fascism in the United States.
I do not doubt that under most circumstances this could save lives. It could provide food, homes and medicine.
I do not believe that it is in any way useful when the state has a monopoly on violence and those with power have no morals, hate your community, want you dead, and will face no enforceable legal consequences for killing you.
I can build the most beautiful community garden that could feed thousands and watch it burn at the hands of a single government agent with a flamethrower. I can build a happy home with my own two hands that will keep the people I love warm through the winter and see it destroyed with a single government approved artillery shell. There is nothing legal that I can build that someone with the power of the government behind them who wants me dead cannot simply destroy immediately along with me.
If the laws on the books do not have any mechanism to punish someone for killing me or those like me, then community organization does little but provide a bit more space to pray that the socie
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: Damn the Elighisl language
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Too real..
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the timing matters more than people admit Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Me_irl
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
the timing matters more than people admit Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.