CMV: American politics was designed to give us all mental disorders
In the US our parties have become ideologically sorted. About 50 years ago there used to be “liberal republicans” and “conservative democrats”. Today that’s almost non existent. In other countries parties are often forced to be more centrist to attract coalition parties. In the US, because it’s a winner takes all system, the constant 4-8 year shift between republican and democrat now feels like a total change in the countries identity constantly and on loop for our entire lives.
Because of this dynamic, as a collective we basically have BPD, DID, Schizo personality disorder, and bipolar disorder. The political related violence in our streets and in our societies closely resemble regular manic episodes. It appears to be manufactured this way and somehow the rich is almost always benefited from this dynamic. Every leader we shift to almost always tends to use selective empathy as a proxy, like claiming to care about LGBT and immigrants, or claiming to care about the economy and individual liberty, and this is because emotional manipulation is the primary tactic that schizophrenics claim the “voices inside their head” use on them as well to justify the harmful acts they do to themselv
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: See y'all then
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately
Reaction: Damn the Elighisl language
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: me_irl
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Interested to see the follow-up.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Just...why??
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: lock in chat
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: Me irl
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place Not convinced this is settled yet.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Me_irl
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Reaction: me_irl
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Me irl
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Me_irl
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context.
the way this is presented changes how it lands
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Hard to say where this lands long term.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Time will tell.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me irl
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart
this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage We’ll see how people react over time.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: very shocking
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Hard to say where this lands long term.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
This is just plain crazy. Our elections are meant for the voters, not to diagnose everyone with mental health issues pre-assessment.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Interested to see the follow-up.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: Me_irl
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: I believed in karma too
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Time will tell.
Reaction: Me irl
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.