CMV: American politics was designed to give us all mental disorders
In the US our parties have become ideologically sorted. About 50 years ago there used to be “liberal republicans” and “conservative democrats”. Today that’s almost non existent. In other countries parties are often forced to be more centrist to attract coalition parties. In the US, because it’s a winner takes all system, the constant 4-8 year shift between republican and democrat now feels like a total change in the countries identity constantly and on loop for our entire lives.
Because of this dynamic, as a collective we basically have BPD, DID, Schizo personality disorder, and bipolar disorder. The political related violence in our streets and in our societies closely resemble regular manic episodes. It appears to be manufactured this way and somehow the rich is almost always benefited from this dynamic. Every leader we shift to almost always tends to use selective empathy as a proxy, like claiming to care about LGBT and immigrants, or claiming to care about the economy and individual liberty, and this is because emotional manipulation is the primary tactic that schizophrenics claim the “voices inside their head” use on them as well to justify the harmful acts they do to themselv
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Me irl
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
the timing matters more than people admit Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week.
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: If I were them, Id hurry up.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
Reaction: me_irl
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit Hard to say where this lands long term.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately