CMV: All Commuters should be required to live within a 30-minute bus drive to attend their university
# Definitions
* **Commuter school:** A college/university where most students travel to college/university for classes and then go home afterwards because of other responsibilities (e.g. job, family, etc).
* **Social life:** An aspect the college offers to student/faculty/staff members to engage with the university outside of academics (e.g. Student organizations (aka clubs), university-sanctioned events (e.g. college sports, music concerts, etc.), parties, traditions (new or existing).
# My Thoughts
It's not uncommon for my university to have students commuting at least 30 minutes to 2 hours to arrive to the university or depart back to their homes. Forcing all of those students to live within a 30-minute bus drive from campus is ultimately necessary because there are academics studies that found that driving affect one's physical and mental health, so not only would this solution cut down the need for them to commute but also reduce the overall traffic of the city. Why travel that long when one can go to another university that will offer the equivalent program?
Doing so would, as a result, improve the overall social life of the university because these students would then have t
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
Reaction: They must be illiterate or something...
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: literally 1984
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: me_irl
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Weird question, but was the person who come up with the term, "love handles" a chubby chaser?
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Weird question, but was the person who come up with the term, "love handles" a chubby chaser?
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable