Closest thing to a realistic AI presenter without filming a real person?
I am trying to create presenter style videos without filming someone on camera. Not cartoon avatars and not over stylized characters.
For people who have tested multiple AI avatars, which ones came closest to realistic motion and voice sync? And what limitations still feel impossible to avoid?
this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me_irl
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Hate when it happens
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split
this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.