Can you support a kid when still in college?
I (M21) know this is a stupid question and it’s kind of depends but I’m just wondering your thoughts on this. I don’t plan on having kids anytime soon, but I know some people that are like friends of friends and they have had kids while still in college and I’m just wondering, especially at my age how hard is that
How do people usually make it work?
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Me irl
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
Not gonna lie, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
Reaction: Some times the dankmemes are found and not created
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do
Reaction: Just always
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: me_irl
the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out.
Reaction: Just...why??
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Time will tell.
this comes across more reactive than planned Curious how this plays out.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on
the follow-through is what will decide this Hard to say where this lands long term.