All emails we send to Gmail are rejected as spam despite full compliance
This one is an ongoing issue for the past month. Essentially all emails sent to Gmail from our domain which is hosted on Microsoft 365 are being rejected with the error "*550 5.7.350 Remote server returned message detected as spam -> 550 5.7.1 \[2a01:111:f403:c40e::1 19\] Gmail has detected that this message;is likely suspicious due to the very low reputation of the sending;domain."* despite our domain's reputation showing as "High" in the old Postmaster Tools.
In the new Postmaster Tools the reason for rejection is shown as either "Email content is possibly spammy" or "Suspected spam", though test emails with simple text in their subject and body are also rejected.
The new Postmaster tools show full compliance in the "Compliance status" section and our DMARC reporting shows that Google's server accepts our email with full passes.
Logging a delivery report through the new Postmaster Tools gets the report closed within an hour with the reason given as "More traffic needed".
Does anyone have a suggestion on how we can get this resolved?
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: very shocking
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Not convinced this is settled yet.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Too real..
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: me_irl