All emails we send to Gmail are rejected as spam despite full compliance
This one is an ongoing issue for the past month. Essentially all emails sent to Gmail from our domain which is hosted on Microsoft 365 are being rejected with the error "*550 5.7.350 Remote server returned message detected as spam -> 550 5.7.1 \[2a01:111:f403:c40e::1 19\] Gmail has detected that this message;is likely suspicious due to the very low reputation of the sending;domain."* despite our domain's reputation showing as "High" in the old Postmaster Tools.
In the new Postmaster Tools the reason for rejection is shown as either "Email content is possibly spammy" or "Suspected spam", though test emails with simple text in their subject and body are also rejected.
The new Postmaster tools show full compliance in the "Compliance status" section and our DMARC reporting shows that Google's server accepts our email with full passes.
Logging a delivery report through the new Postmaster Tools gets the report closed within an hour with the reason given as "More traffic needed".
Does anyone have a suggestion on how we can get this resolved?
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: me_irl
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
this comes across more reactive than planned Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: Me_irl
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Me_irl
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place
this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Time will tell.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me
Reaction: French is so hard
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Let’s see what happens next.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Me_irl
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Curious how this plays out.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Too real..
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. Time will tell.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: very shocking
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Not convinced this is settled yet.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Too real..
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: me_irl