22nd birthday today; I dread the 23rd.
wow what a terrible feeling. I feel like it’s all downhill from here. I’m gonna finish college and (hopefully) get a job and do that until I die. My parents are in their 60’s and I don’t know how much longer I have them. I feel so isolated all the time, even when I’m with others. My birthday used to make me happy, now it makes me sad, and it gets worse every year. Call the geopolitical atmosphere the cherry on top, but honestly, I can’t even care about that right now. I can’t afford to live, even if I could, id still be rich and sad. I can’t keep doing this for another 30-40 years. I didn’t ask for any of this
this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
Reaction: The adjective for metal is metallic, but not so for iron
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: The adjective for metal is metallic, but not so for iron
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: POV: You Are Brooklyn Jail Warden, What Will You Do?
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: He belongs to her now.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate
Reaction: They must be illiterate or something...
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Time will tell.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Curious how this plays out.
the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split
the wording alone shifts how people read this Hard to say where this lands long term.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Me_irl
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: I cannot elaborate on this meme
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart
the follow-through is what will decide this
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: me_irl
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Curious how this plays out.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Time will tell.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Not convinced this is settled yet.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on
Reaction: literally 1984
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Feels like there’s more coming here.