Wouldn’t a rouge AGI or ASI accumulating resources covertly for computation look just like our current AI bubble?
Just a thought I have been having, wouldn’t the blind devotion to building more data centers, removing regulation and insane stock prices for AI companies be the exact way a covert AGI or rouge system would operate and incentivize us to serve its interests?
Not saying it’s actually happening
Edit: Rogue not rouge
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Something I've observed
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: "I Can't Eat This!" ~Pig
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this
Reaction: me_irl
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: French is so hard
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: Jiggle physics
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Its that simple
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Let’s see what happens next.