Wouldn’t a rouge AGI or ASI accumulating resources covertly for computation look just like our current AI bubble?
Just a thought I have been having, wouldn’t the blind devotion to building more data centers, removing regulation and insane stock prices for AI companies be the exact way a covert AGI or rouge system would operate and incentivize us to serve its interests?
Not saying it’s actually happening
Edit: Rogue not rouge
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Hard to say where this lands long term.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Let’s see what happens next.
the wording alone shifts how people read this This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s just how it reads to me.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit That part stands out.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome