Windows Server 2022 not showing December CU?
I went to update a Windows Server 2022 box and it picked up the Security Intelligence Update and the MSRT but it's not showing the December CU as available. The November CU was skipped so the most recent one shown in the history is from October. Why would it not show the December CU? The only GPO on it has "Configure Automatic Updates" disabled under "Administrative Templates/Windows Components/Windows Update/Manage end user experience" is disabled; would it have anything to do with it? How can I get the December CU on it? Were there any issues with the December CU?
SOLVED:
Unbeknowst to me it was patched with a third party patching solution so the Windows Update History doesn't capture those events. The OS Build is at the current level, 20348.4529. All is good. Must be a Friday thing.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: POV: You Are Brooklyn Jail Warden, What Will You Do?
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Let’s see what happens next.
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: lock in chat
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: problem solved
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Just always
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: me_irl
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands Curious how this plays out.
the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Just...why??
Reaction: me_irl
the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Its been 3 years since I last saw morning
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Me_irl
Reaction: Me_irl
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: Just...why??
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split
Reaction: Just...why??
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.