Which web tools to create high quality AI images?
Which tool do you use to create AI images? I tried Microsoft Designer website but the quality was very poor. The generator in free ChatGPT is a bit better but I am still not able to produce images without obvious artifacts. Are the images of the paid version better or is it just faster and you have move requests available? The descriptions in the "Upgrade you plan" dialogue are very vague. Are the any more alternatives?
P.S. I do not want to install terabytes of data and install douzands of plugins and extensions for a local model. I prefer a web solution. Thank you in advance.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent Curious how this plays out.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Let’s see what happens next.
this feels more about execution than intent
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.