What’s your wild take on the rise of AI?
We have entered an era of AI doing \_almost\_ anything. From vibe coding, to image/video creation, new age of SEO, etc etc…
But what do you think AI is going to be able to do in the near future?
Just a few years ago we were laughing at people saying AI will be able to make apps, for example, or do complex mathematical calculation, and here we are haha
So what’s your “wild take” some people might laugh at, but it’s 100% achievable in the future?
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like there’s more coming here.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately
the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell.
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.