What's the point of having the crosspost feature if you can never use it?
I see so many subreddits that don't allow any sort of cross posting or "self-promoting" or "advertising." Which, I could understand if it was just links outside of Reddit, but if you're someone who's started a community, especially a very niche one, how are you supposed to ever share it or talk about it, if nowhere will even let you do it?
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Hard to say where this lands long term.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That part stands out.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately Time will tell.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Hard to say where this lands long term.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Time will tell.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Time will tell.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Interested to see the follow-up.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting.
this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.