What are the differences between American biker gangs and Canadian biker gangs. Can't imagine why I'd never thought of b
I just finished watching the interrogation of a guy in Canada who was in a biker gang and had been for years. He offed two people; that's why he was being interrogated. For the record, it wasn't gang-related.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this Curious how this plays out.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.