We are disgustingly free
It’s not a metaphor.
We are not bound to anything.
Not to relationships.
Not to society.
You don’t even owe anything to your own life.
Nothing external to your core can truly touch you.
If you’re an atheist, not even death.
There are no consequences.
No punishment.
That makes you even freer,
because not even the fear of physical consequences
is attached to you.
That makes us almost free.
But what about someone with enough individual power?
Someone who can move within society,
among people,
using the system to move through the world
without belonging to it.
That person is absolutely free here.
Because their core is already theirs.
They depend on nothing,
because they owe nothing.
And what are they going to do with that?
They are alone.
Sometimes isolated.
If their core is real, it can even be liberating.
But there’s a problem:
they won’t have a purpose.
They will simply keep existing.
And that is torture
for someone who searches for meaning
in a world that doesn’t have it.
They can create a purpose.
As long as it’s real.
As long as it doesn’t cage them.
I’m not talking about getting a job.
Or becoming a millionaire.
I’m talking about a purpose that,
even if it has a material side,
h
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Time will tell.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That part stands out.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so We’ll see how people react over time.
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands Let’s see what happens next.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this
the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Time will tell.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Interested to see the follow-up.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Let’s see what happens next.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven