Upopular opinion: AI makes you more intelligent
Many people grew up with subpar educators and terrible google results. Few have the time or capacity to read research papers. We have a $20/mo superhuman assistant that is getting billions of dollars of funding to constantly improve accuracy. This is a massive upgrade for everyone's learning. Those who proudly proclaim they aren't "dumbing themselves down with AI" are intellectual elitists drinking copium as the world catches up and passes them.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore
the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Curious how this plays out.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so At least from my perspective.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This could age very differently in a week.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell.
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Time will tell.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this Curious how this plays out.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit We’ll see how people react over time.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This probably isn’t the last word on it.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.